Wednesday, 7 October 2015

Manage the patient suffering marine envenomation - Student with special needs - low levels of technology knowledge and experience

Manage the patient suffering marine envenomation.

The how, what, when, where, why of a student’s experience

(Special needs - mature age student with low levels of knowledge and experience with technology)
The following is written from a first person student perspective.

My role within the group

During my residential school for the above I was involved in a number of OSCEs (practical scenarios) around managing the patient suffering Marine Envenomation.  These were for both practice and assessment purposes.  All scenarios were conducted in a group of four with students who were able to pick their own groups.

In addition to the four students each group had an experienced Paramedic/tutor assigned to them.  Their role was to run the overall scenario and to assist us with direction and feedback.
Within these scenarios (OSCEs) I had a number of roles including:
·         Primary Officer
·         Reviewer giving feedback
·         Marker for my peers

OSCE

The OSCE component of the course consisted of a number of role play exercises at the beach.  A joint exercise was held with Surf Life Savers and professional actors and moulage (makeup) to ensure the simulations looked and felt as real as possible.

Refreshingly all scenarios were based on the professional experiences of paramedics working with the program or the course coordinator, also an experienced paramedic.

Tasks

During each of the above OSCEs I performed a different role as designated by a predetermined roster rotation.  This worked well overall as it provided every person with a balance of performing the stressful primary officer role and the other more relaxed roles.  In the past some course coordinators haven’t scheduled this resulting in some students not participating as they should.

OSCE 1 – Marker.

Prior to the commencement of the OSCE the assessor provided an I pad which had a form on it for marking my peers performance.  As someone who distrusts technology and only uses computers when I have to I disliked this immensely.

The instructor we had assigned to our group did provide a brief on how to use it but this was done very quickly as each scenario was scheduled into a rotation and time was of the essence.  I didn’t really understand it and when I asked if I could just use pen and paper I was told NO we need it done on the I pad so it could be saved and uploaded to the ‘cloud’.

I had real trouble seeing the screen due to the bright sunlight and kept accidently ticking the wrong boxes just by placing my fingers in the wrong place.  In the end one of the younger members of our group helped me which I found quite embarrassing as they referred to me as a ‘technological dinosaur’.

I believe if we are expected to be using this technology we should be trained in how to use it.  There was an assumption everyone uses I pads all the time so we should know how to do this.  I found this the most stressful component of the course.

OSCE 2 – Primary Officer.

Coming from a tropical area I was familiar with marine envenomation and the treatment for it and I loved having the chance to put my skills into practice.  I found this OSCE challenging as the actor playing the patient was screaming with pain initially and it all felt very real. 

Having the Surf Life Saver there as well provided us with another set of hands but I found managing them along with my second officer very taxing.  The 20 minute time limit seemed to go quickly but I managed to achieve most of the tasks I needed to.

As a Supervisor in my day job I’m comfortable with providing direction to people and I used these skills during the OSCE.  What was new was trying to employ these in a time pressured emergency situation.

Overall whilst challenging I enjoyed the experience and learned a lot from doing this role.

OSCE 3 – Reviewer.

As a Supervisor in my day job I’m comfortable with commenting on the performance of others and giving constructive feedback.

As this was a subject I felt comfortable with I enjoyed just being able to watch and TAKE NOTES WITH PEN AND PAPER before giving feedback to my peers.   I thought this process was well managed by the Instructor assigned to our group and it felt like a very supportive learning environment.

Part of my role should have been to video tape the scenarios using an I pad but knowing my distaste for the device the Instructor undertook this for me whilst I used pen and paper to record feedback.  This was a small concession for him but one which I highly appreciated.

Results

All passed this in-depth assessment and I found the marking rubric to be easy to understand as it involved tasks which were completed or not completed.

The Instructor assigned to our group also allowed the group a lot of freedom to provide constructive feedback which I enjoyed.  Within this course it felt like our opinions mattered.  The only time our instructor intervened in the feedback process was to add something we hadn’t considered and to moderate comments if they were becoming more personal than about the learning experience.

Reflections

Learning reflections

This was a positive experience overall and very realistic.  I can see there was a huge effort made to make these scenes as authentic as possible and holding the residential school at the beach was a nice touch.

Having each group complete the OSCE three times (members in different roles) did become a little monotonous and by the time the third person went through they knew what to expect, when and I thought there wasn’t much to be learnt by then.  Two repetitions would be good.

Actors and the Surf Lifesavers contributed to the realism and I enjoyed having them as part of the scene.


Technology reflections

As someone who distrusts technology I felt completely out of my depth with this and highly embarrassed by the way in which my interaction with this component was done.
I can’t see any reason why I couldn’t have filled out a form using a pen and paper and have someone look after the computer side later.

I also believe the course coordinator should seriously look at whether this is appropriate technology to use as many people had trouble viewing a screen outside. 
The memory was also an issue with at least two I pads becoming full and stopping taping during the 
OSCE.

If the course coordinator is set on using the marking forms on the I pads then we should be provided with training on how to do it WELL AHEAD OF TIME and not on the day.  This could be done as a  morning when first arriving at the residential school.

Conclusion

Overall I felt this component of the residential school was well organised and I learned a lot from repetitively performing OSCEs and watching others do them as well.  The authenticity really showed through from location to involvement of Surf Lifesaving and having actors perform the role of patient and I think it was a comfortable learning environment.

However, I also believe technology got in the way of learning at times and this needs to be addressed.  I don’t think we needed the technology as marking could be done using a pen and paper, I realise I’m in the minority here but that is my view.

The OSCE format is great already but with a few minor adjustments could be even better.

**Course Coordinators note

The reflections on technology are very valid and this was an unexpected consequence of utilising the technology.

The utilisation of google drive to sync devices and marking sheets in this medium size cohort is too convenient to stop using but as recommended we will be undertaking a greater training program for students well ahead of time.

Device choice of the ipad for filming is also in question and a review of stand alone cameras will be undertaken for suitability of purpose.




No comments:

Post a Comment